But
first, what is the evidence to show that Diabetes can indeed be reversed. Well
first, it has been found that in people who qualify for bariatric surgery, that
after surgery these individuals tend to quickly have their blood sugar level
return to normal. Although there are some associated risks with the surgery and
other post-surgery risks such as osteoporosis and nutrient deficiency, the
benefits of the surgery, far outweighs the disadvantages.
The
obvious and indeed often drastic improvement in patients' blood sugar status
after this type of surgery and a dissatisfaction with the explanation offered
by the surgeon, that it was due to the interference with appetite controlling
gut hormones, led Doctor Roy Taylor of Newcastle University in 2011 to take
action.
His own
interpretation of why the surgery worked was that "(the surgery) led to a
sudden shift of fat away from the liver and pancreas... " His approach was
to using Type 2 diabetics investigate a low carbohydrate 600 calorie day diet
which was calibrated to mimic the very sharp reduction in food intake after a
bariatric procedure.
The diet
was a liquid diet containing carbohydrate, vitamins, protein, fat, minerals and
trace elements. "I predicted this could strip fat out of the liver and
pancreas and both organs would return to normal - and our subsequent work has
confirmed this.'
So what
exactly was the study that Professor Roy embarked on that led him to confirm
this. Well, it is known as the Newcastle case or diet.
In 2011
Roy Taylor and his research group at the University of Newcastle placed 11
individuals suffering from Type 2 diabetes and with a body index (weight
corrected for height, the norm being 25kg/m2) of 33kg/m2 on an extreme 600
calorie liquid diet. This is supplemented by 3 portions of non-starchy
vegetables a day which brings the total calorie intake to 800 calories per day
for 8 weeks. Dramatically, less than a week thereafter, their blood sugar level
fell from 9 to 6 mmol/l. Diabetes is said to be present when blood sugar is
above 6.5mmol/l. and throughout the course of the study, it remained steady
within the healthy blood sugar range.
In
addition, their body mass index BMI graduated down from 33 to 29kg/m2, a direct
reflection of a weight reduction from 101 to 88kg. Further it was found that
this weight loss correlated greatly with a reduced amount of fat within the
liver and pancreas. The result was that insulin quantity produced by the
pancreas increased and the action of insulin on the liver was significantly
improved.
In a
corresponding second trial 54 year old Alan Tutty was able to successfully lose
26lb and reduce his weight to 13st 3lbs reversing his diabetes in the process.
Accordingly,
the study did indeed prove that by a significant loss of weight, blood sugar
levels in diabetes sufferers can fall and as such leave sufferers cured. This
was in a controlled environment. What would happen in a non- laboratory
environment? Could such an approach work in the real world. An opportunity soon
presented itself.
Later
that year, Richard Doughty was diagnosed with diabetes. Getting in contact with
Prof Roy, he was encouraged to go on the diet. The diet consisted of the
standard 800 calories and surprisingly less than two weeks (11 days) after, his
blood sugar level had dropped to the non-diabetic 5.1mmol/l and he was on his next
visit told by his GP "Your diabetes has resolved itself".
Nor was
this just a fluke. Carlos Cervantes, 53 and from the US, already suffering from
the ravages of the disease-failing kidneys and eyesight heard of Richards case
and used the diet. He was able to reduce his weight from 120 to 80kg and
reverse his diabetes. So too did Henry Cole, 67 of New Jersey, USA. Following
the diet, he was able to reduce his weight to 70 from 81kg and his HbA1c level
to 5.6% from 6.9%. And swinging back across the Atlantic again we have Steve
Vincent, 58, from Southampton, England, who in December 2010 was diagnosed with
type 2 diabetes. Following the diet with tenacity, he achieved success and was
able to bring his weight down to 72 from 93kg and halve his HbA1c by bringing
it down to 5.5% from a previous 10.7%.
Roy
Taylors study and explanation for his results has been peer reviewed and
corroborated by other scientists. One of these is Naveed Sattar, one of the
UK's leading diabetes researchers and professor of metabolic medicine at the
University of Glasgow. He said; if we consume more calories than we burn, we
store the excess as fat. Among the places we store it are the pancreas and the
liver, thus interfering with the former's capacity to produce insulin, and the latter's
capacity to react to it. The effect of the extreme 600-calorie-a-day diet was
to not only reduce body weight dramatically, but also to slash fat on the liver
and pancreas. This then allows the pancreas to produce insulin and the liver to
react to it.
But is
this approach for everyone, and should you attempt it? Maybe not. Professor Roy
was quick to point out that Type 2 diabetes only happens when a personal fat
threshold was exceeded.
What this
means is that depending on certain factors, BMI as it relates to your
ethnicity, family history etc., some persons may be more predisposed to getting
diabetes than others. That being the case, the amount of fat that a person can
safely or should successfully try to lose may differ from one person to
another. For example it has been found that some people with an apparently
healthy BMI develop diabetes whilst others with BMIs in the 40s range do not.
Further,
even with low BMIs people of South Asian descent can develop diabetes. As such
it may be unsafe for one diabetic with a BMI less than 35 to attempt to lose as
much weight as another diabetic of his weight class. Being of the same weight
class does not automatically follow that their personal fat index will tally.
Dr. Sattar elaborated on this "We're thinking it's about an individual's
ability to make and store fat safely," he says. "Some people can
store fat subcutaneously. With others, it goes straight to the liver and
pancreas. That's the classic big waist, pot belly shape; the fat isn't distributed
around the body." This explains why simple waist measurement - 37in or
more for men, 35in for South Asian men, 31.5in for women - is now seen as a
better risk indicator for diabetes than BMI.
In view
of this, the sharp reduction in weight may not be for every body and it is best
that one discusses it with one's doctor first before attempting to go on the
diet. Though it is safe to say that losing weight within the general
populations' normal range is a boon to good health.
The work
continues though. The Newcastle study was in people who have type 2 diabetes of
up to 4 years. Study is now being made to find out whether by a similar diet,
people of longer duration diabetes could equally have their condition reversed.
In a reply letter to questions frequently asked, Professor Roy Taylor continued
that, "... there is good reason to believe that longer duration type 2
diabetes can be reversible, although after 10 - 15 years of diabetes it is
likely that not everyone will be able to achieve a return to normal glucose
control, despite major weight loss".
Whilst
many are excited and bask in the euphoria of this apparent success against the
disease, others demur, they opine that the true test of whether diabetes
reversal amounted to a cure would depend on whether such patients can return to
their old diet without hindrance. That is to say whether they can start eating
anything they like again.
Well,
while this may sound reasonable, it should be noted that the reversal of short
duration Type 2 diabetes is premised on the individual's ability to free the
pancreas and liver from excessive fat. As such where fat begins to build up
again, the individual may just find him/herself sliding back into the maws of
the condition.
On the
obverse however (since fat build up in pancreas and liver is gradual) to
contend that this automatically meant reversal did not constitute a cure would
be to imply by a cure, a return to a pancreatic/liver health status the patient
did not have immediately prior to the onset of the disease. In my humble opinion,
in that light, reversal does constitute cure. In that very same light, it is
neither safe nor expedient for such persons to return strictly to their
pre-reversal diet. That indeed would be fool hardy.
No comments:
Post a Comment